
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌159.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+89.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 392.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+89.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 392.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌159.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 40HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 7600

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 89.5%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 16,581+90% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+186% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2655 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+13% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: No vs VCN 4.0.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 11.4% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 165W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 100.5+112% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 61.5% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 392.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $269-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 61.6+393% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #302 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













