
GeForce GTX 1050
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,390 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2226.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 230W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2172.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌283.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 60W.
GeForce GTX 1050
2016RTXA5000-8Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,390 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2226.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 230W, a 170W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌2172.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 45.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌283.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 better than RTXA5000-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTXA5000-8Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
The GeForce GTX 1050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,033 points. Launch price was $109.

RTXA5000-8Q
RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 scores 5,033 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 is built on Pascal while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,033+2% | 4,916 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 8192+1180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.862 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+1391% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1695 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 256+540% |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 8 MB+3378% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 draws 60W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-74% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 83.9+292% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 launched at $110 MSRP, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500. The GeForce GTX 1050 costs 95.6% less ($2390 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.8 (GeForce GTX 1050) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 offers 2190% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-96% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.8+2190% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | GA102 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #443 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













