
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10,806 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 986.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 600W, a 315W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 96 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 240).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (96 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1352.4% HIGHER MSRP$11,605 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($11,605 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 600W vs 285W.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10,806 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 986.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $11,605 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 285W instead of 600W, a 315W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅213.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 240).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (96 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 96 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1352.4% HIGHER MSRP$11,605 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($11,605 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ❌110.5% higher power demand at 600W vs 285W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition better than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4070 Ti make more sense than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 887 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 707 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 254 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 877 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 784 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition
The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,223 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition's 42,223 — the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition leads by 33.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2617 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) with 240 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578 | 42,223+34% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 24064+213% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+214% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2617 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 240 | 752+213% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 23.5 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 128 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 188+213% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 752+213% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition has 96 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) — a 255.6% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition. Bus width: 192-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) — the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 96 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+256% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 512-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 128 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition's 600W — a 71.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-53% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+57% | 70.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition launched at $11605. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 93.1% less ($10806 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.6 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 997.2% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-93% | $11605 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+997% | 3.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | GB202 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












