
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌100.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6900 XT
2020RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌100.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than Radeon RX 6900 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6900 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 924 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 683 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6900 XT and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 26,729 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell reaches 26,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) vs 280.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,729 | 26,498 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 8960+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.04 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+9% | 2055 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+33% | 96 |
| TMUs | 320+14% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 8.8 MB+780% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+14% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6900 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 18.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+19% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6900 XT draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.5 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 140W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.5 | 2-20% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.1 | 189.3+112% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The Radeon RX 6900 XT costs 50% less ($1000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 101.5% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-50% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8+102% | 13.3 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GB203 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #35 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












