
GeForce RTX 3080
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (272 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 320W vs 140W.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅2.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 272).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 320W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌186% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3080
2020RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 170.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅2.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 272).
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 320W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (272 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 320W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌186% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.3 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 869 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
The GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,071 points. Launch price was $699.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3080 scores 25,071 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 5.7%. The GeForce RTX 3080 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8,704 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 29.77 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 272 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,071 | 26,498+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8704 | 8960+3% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.77 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2055 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 272 | 280+3% |
| L1 Cache | 8.5 MB | 8.8 MB+4% |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | 70+3% |
| Tensor Cores | 272 | 280+3% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 760 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 75.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080. Bus width: 320-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 5 MB (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 48 MB (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 24 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 760 GB/s+76% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+67% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 draws 320W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 140W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.3 | 189.3+142% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3080 launched at $699 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3080 costs 65% less ($1300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3080 offers 169.9% better value. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-65% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.9+170% | 13.3 |
| Codename | GA102 | GB203 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #41 | #48 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












