
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅3.2% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌350.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.2% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 285W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌23.9% higher power demand at 285W vs 230W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌350.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 49.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 240 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+50% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 10240+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+18% | 34.1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+57% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 320+33% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 10 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 80+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 320+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 768 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 21.4% difference. The RTX A5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 230W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 450W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+21% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 77.8% less ($2801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 569.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-78% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+569% | 5.9 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












