
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,221 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 917% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 144).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌849.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 59.6 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
2025RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,221 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 917% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅122.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 144).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (144 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌849.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 59.6 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB better than RTX A5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 694 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 508 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 533 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and RTX A5500

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,599 points. Launch price was $379.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB scores 22,599 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB leads by 7.1%. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2572 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 80 (RTX A5500) with 144 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,599+7% | 21,108 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 10240+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.7 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz+54% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 320+122% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 10 MB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 80+122% |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 320+122% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX A5500 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 71.4% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB draws 180W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.5+37% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB costs 89.5% less ($3221 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers 910.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-89% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+910% | 5.9 |
| Codename | GB206 | GA102 |
| Release | April 16 2025 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #60 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












