
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX A5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,591 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 232).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,951 vs 24,805).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌229.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,591 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅10.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 232).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,951 vs 24,805).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌229.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile better than RTX A5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and RTX A5000

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

RTX A5000
RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 versus the RTX A5000's 22,951 — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile leads by 8.1%. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 232 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805+8% | 22,951 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424 | 8192+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz+19% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232 | 256+10% |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB | 8 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 64+10% |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | 256+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 has 24 GB. The RTX A5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A5000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 42.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-35% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+66% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile launched at $1130 MSRP, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile costs 69.6% less ($2591 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile offers 254.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1130-70% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+255% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #43 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












