
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:

RTX A5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,222 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 638% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 230W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌645.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌39.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 165W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,222 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 638% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 230W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌645.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌39.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5000 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB make more sense than RTX A5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and RTX A5000

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A5000
RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 22,951+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 8192+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+50% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256+88% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 8 MB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 64+88% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 256+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A5000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 has 24 GB. The RTX A5000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A5000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 32.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-28% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+38% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB costs 86.6% less ($3222 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 633.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-87% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+634% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #56 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












