G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+409.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1325% higher power demand at 285W vs 20W.
❌247.6% longer card at 285mm vs 82mm.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 285W, a 265W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 285mm, a 203mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,197 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅+409.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 20W instead of 285W, a 265W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 285mm, a 203mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌1325% higher power demand at 285W vs 20W.
❌247.6% longer card at 285mm vs 82mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,197 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX A500 Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 6,197 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX A500 Embedded GPU is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 409.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 409.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX A500 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX A500 Embedded GPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX A500 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	188 FPS	81 FPS
medium	171 FPS	70 FPS
high	155 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	71 FPS
medium	125 FPS	62 FPS
high	111 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	26 FPS
medium	79 FPS	24 FPS
high	66 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	664 FPS	115 FPS
medium	539 FPS	90 FPS
high	415 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	53 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	86 FPS
medium	400 FPS	64 FPS
high	329 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	40 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	51 FPS
medium	211 FPS	39 FPS
high	187 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	921 FPS	279 FPS
medium	742 FPS	223 FPS
high	652 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	209 FPS
medium	578 FPS	167 FPS
high	497 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	105 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	139 FPS
medium	403 FPS	112 FPS
high	352 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	70 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX A500 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	879 FPS	156 FPS
medium	731 FPS	127 FPS
high	664 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	89 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	112 FPS
medium	585 FPS	93 FPS
high	514 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	66 FPS
medium	408 FPS	54 FPS
high	366 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	32 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 6,197 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 409.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1335 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) with 240 Tensor cores vs 64.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	31,578+410%	6,197
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	4 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	7680+275%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+633%	5.468 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+96%	1335 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	240+275%	64
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+275%	2 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+275%	16
Tensor Cores	240+275%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A500 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12_2
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 173.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
TDP	285W	20W-93%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	82mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	110.8	309.9+180%