
FirePro W9000
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1270% higher power demand at 274W vs 20W.
- ❌240.2% longer card at 279mm vs 82mm.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 274W, a 254W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 279mm, a 197mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
FirePro W9000
2012RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 274W, a 254W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 279mm, a 197mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1270% higher power demand at 274W vs 20W.
- ❌240.2% longer card at 279mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A500 Embedded GPU better than FirePro W9000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro W9000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,197 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W9000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 172.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 20W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 309.9+1277% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | — |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA107S |
| Release | June 14 2012 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #390 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













