Arc A380 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Intel

Arc A380

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 435 MHzBoost: 1335 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 275% higher power demand at 75W vs 20W.
  • 131.7% longer card at 190mm vs 82mm.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 20W instead of 75W, a 55W reduction.
  • Measures 82mm instead of 190mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A380 better than RTX A500 Embedded GPU?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,301 vs 6,197 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A380 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A380 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Arc A380 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $149 MSRP. Arc A380 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A380 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $149 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $149 MSRP gets you and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is RTX A500 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. RTX A500 Embedded GPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A380 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low128 FPS81 FPS
medium114 FPS70 FPS
high96 FPS57 FPS
ultra72 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low118 FPS71 FPS
medium99 FPS62 FPS
high81 FPS44 FPS
ultra61 FPS28 FPS
4K
low52 FPS26 FPS
medium48 FPS24 FPS
high35 FPS16 FPS
ultra31 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low137 FPS115 FPS
medium101 FPS90 FPS
high72 FPS70 FPS
ultra47 FPS53 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS86 FPS
medium61 FPS64 FPS
high45 FPS52 FPS
ultra33 FPS40 FPS
4K
low41 FPS51 FPS
medium30 FPS39 FPS
high25 FPS31 FPS
ultra18 FPS23 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low284 FPS279 FPS
medium227 FPS223 FPS
high189 FPS186 FPS
ultra142 FPS139 FPS
1440p
low213 FPS209 FPS
medium170 FPS167 FPS
high142 FPS139 FPS
ultra106 FPS105 FPS
4K
low142 FPS139 FPS
medium113 FPS112 FPS
high95 FPS93 FPS
ultra71 FPS70 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
1080p
low284 FPS156 FPS
medium227 FPS127 FPS
high189 FPS108 FPS
ultra142 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low213 FPS112 FPS
medium170 FPS93 FPS
high142 FPS80 FPS
ultra106 FPS66 FPS
4K
low142 FPS66 FPS
medium113 FPS54 FPS
high95 FPS43 FPS
ultra71 FPS32 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Intel

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1335 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A380) vs 16 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) with 128 Tensor cores vs 64.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
6,301+2%
6,197
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Ampere
Process Node
6 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS+30%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+54%
1335 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
8
16+100%
Tensor Cores
128+100%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12_2
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 115.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureArc A380RTX A500 Embedded GPU
TDP
75W
20W-73%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
190mm
82mm
Height
114mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
59
Perf/Watt
84.0
309.9+269%