
Arc A380
Popular choices:

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A380
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌275% higher power demand at 75W vs 20W.
- ❌131.7% longer card at 190mm vs 82mm.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 75W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 190mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Arc A380
2022RTX A500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 75W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 190mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌275% higher power demand at 75W vs 20W.
- ❌131.7% longer card at 190mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A380 better than RTX A500 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A500 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU

Arc A380
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1335 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A380) vs 16 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) with 128 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301+2% | 6,197 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+54% | 1335 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 16+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 115.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Arc A380 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 20W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 82mm |
| Height | 114mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 59 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0 | 309.9+269% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













