
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 225.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌582.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 225.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌582.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4500 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A4500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4500
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX A4500 leads by 109.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 21,094+110% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7168+180% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+167% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+5% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 7 MB+645% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 133.3% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-10% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 105.5+89% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 85.3% less ($1450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 225.8% better value. The RTX A4500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-85% | $1699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+226% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













