
Arc B570
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅43.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌49.1% longer card at 249mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 249mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌105% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Arc B570
2025RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅43.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 249mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌49.1% longer card at 249mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌105% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than RTX A2000 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A2000 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and RTX A2000 12GB

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 144 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060+2% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3328+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+44% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+108% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+67% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+38% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+36% | 3.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 26+44% |
| Tensor Cores | 144+38% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc B570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7 | 196.0+109% |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The Arc B570 costs 51.2% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Arc B570 offers 109.8% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-51% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+110% | 30.6 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA106 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #169 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













