G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

✅63.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
6.8% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅63.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
6.8% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 3000 better than RTX A1000?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 3000 averages 63.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,858 vs 10,814 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 3000 is a 2018 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while RTX A1000 is a 2024 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A1000 is easier to justify on price alone at $749 MSRP, but Quadro RTX 3000 is still the stronger gaming card overall. Quadro RTX 3000 is about 6.8% more expensive on MSRP at $800 MSRP versus $749 MSRP, and you are getting 63.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.4% higher G3D Mark. RTX A1000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with Quadro RTX 3000 if you want the better experience; go with RTX A1000 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.

When does RTX A1000 make more sense than Quadro RTX 3000?

Yes. RTX A1000 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $749 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 3000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 3000 currently gives you 0.4% higher G3D Mark and 63.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. RTX A1000 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 3000 Benchmark Check

RTX A1000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
1080p
low	123 FPS	107 FPS
medium	113 FPS	90 FPS
high	98 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	93 FPS
medium	91 FPS	77 FPS
high	77 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	37 FPS
medium	50 FPS	34 FPS
high	41 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	17 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open RTX A1000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
1080p
low	451 FPS	120 FPS
medium	391 FPS	97 FPS
high	317 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	296 FPS	88 FPS
medium	244 FPS	68 FPS
high	211 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	143 FPS	53 FPS
medium	126 FPS	42 FPS
high	108 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	24 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open RTX A1000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
1080p
low	489 FPS	487 FPS
medium	391 FPS	389 FPS
high	326 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	365 FPS
medium	293 FPS	292 FPS
high	244 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	243 FPS
medium	195 FPS	195 FPS
high	163 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	122 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open RTX A1000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
1080p
low	489 FPS	243 FPS
medium	391 FPS	209 FPS
high	326 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	142 FPS
1440p
low	366 FPS	182 FPS
medium	293 FPS	159 FPS
high	244 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	244 FPS	103 FPS
medium	195 FPS	85 FPS
high	163 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	54 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 Open RTX A1000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 and RTX A1000

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the RTX A1000 reaches 10,814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 576 Tensor cores vs 72.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score	10,858	10,814
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4608+100%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS+142%	6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+21%	1462 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	288+300%	72
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+96%	2.3 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72+300%	18
Tensor Cores	576+700%	72

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 3000 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 has 8 GB. The RTX A1000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 135.5% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 163mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
TDP	260W	50W-81%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	163mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	41.8	216.3+417%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 3000 launched at $800 MSRP, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. The RTX A1000 costs 6.4% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 offers 5.9% better value. The RTX A1000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).