
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅19.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 173mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌200.8% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅19.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 163mm instead of 173mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌200.8% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 389 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 122 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A1000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A1000
RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the RTX A1000 leads by 7.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1462 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,814+7% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+32% | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+19% | 1462 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+122% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.3 MB+145% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 has 8 GB. The RTX A1000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 163mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 216.3+287% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 66.8% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 180.6% better value. The RTX A1000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-67% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+181% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #251 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













