
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅48.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅48.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) with 96 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353+3% | 11,009 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+149% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz+66% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 96+50% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 35W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Height | — | 4mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7 | 314.5+219% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












