
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌528.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 35W.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 220W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980
2014RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 220W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A1000 Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌528.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 35W.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU better than GeForce GTX 980?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077 | 11,009 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS+7% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz+7% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4 | 314.5+524% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GA107S |
| Release | September 19 2014 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #245 | #246 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












