
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 844.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅13.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅136.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (28,454 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌750.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅+11% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 844.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅13.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅136.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 240).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (28,454 vs 31,578).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌750.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 6000 Ada Generation still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 11%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 240 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+11% | 28,454 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 18176+137% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+127% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+4% | 2505 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 240 | 568+137% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 17.8 MB+137% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 142+137% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 568+137% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 90.5% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 960 GB/s+90% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 5.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-5% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+17% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 88.2% less ($6000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 840.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-88% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+840% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












