
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,870 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 424.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 285W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅89.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 232).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌431% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ❌90% higher power demand at 285W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,870 less on MSRP ($1,130 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 424.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 285W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅89.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 232).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌431% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$1,130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ❌90% higher power demand at 285W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5880 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile make more sense than RTX 5880 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 915 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and RTX 5880 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation reaches 25,096 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 110 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) with 232 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805 | 25,096+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424 | 14080+90% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS+180% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz | 2460 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 232 | 440+90% |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB | 13.8 MB+89% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 110+90% |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | 440+90% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5880 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 72 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 285W — a 62.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Power connectors: Mobile vs 16-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-47% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 16-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+88% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile launched at $1130 MSRP, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile costs 81.2% less ($4870 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile offers 423.8% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1130-81% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+424% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 5 2024 |
| Ranking | #43 | #40 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












