
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅65.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
Quadro P4000
2017RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅65.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than Quadro P4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 11,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 12,800 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2550 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431+2% | 11,153 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 12800+614% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+1131% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 2550 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 112 | 400+257% |
| L1 Cache | 0.66 MB | 12.5 MB+1794% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 72 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.2 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 250W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-58% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+144% | 44.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | AD102 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #239 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












