
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅71.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅71.0% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 137.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 96 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353 | 26,919+137% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5888+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+151% |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz | 2475 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 184+92% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 5.8 MB+93% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 36 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 46+92% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 184+92% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 36 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 54% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-43% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7 | 134.6+36% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












