G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 200W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 304mm, a 102mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅351.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 33.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌122.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 90W.
❌50.5% longer card at 304mm vs 202mm.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 200W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 304mm, a 102mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅351.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 33.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌122.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 90W.
❌50.5% longer card at 304mm vs 202mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 950?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 351.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 5,357 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 950 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 402.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 276.7% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 351.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 402.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 950 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 950 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 5,357 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	79 FPS	183 FPS
medium	64 FPS	167 FPS
high	52 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	150 FPS
medium	54 FPS	124 FPS
high	39 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	92 FPS
medium	22 FPS	78 FPS
high	14 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	107 FPS	544 FPS
medium	79 FPS	454 FPS
high	61 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	54 FPS	351 FPS
medium	39 FPS	288 FPS
high	26 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	172 FPS
medium	14 FPS	144 FPS
high	11 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	101 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	241 FPS	884 FPS
medium	193 FPS	713 FPS
high	161 FPS	643 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	684 FPS
medium	145 FPS	549 FPS
high	121 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	467 FPS
medium	96 FPS	373 FPS
high	77 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	277 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	140 FPS	751 FPS
medium	113 FPS	612 FPS
high	97 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	102 FPS	615 FPS
medium	84 FPS	500 FPS
high	73 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	384 FPS
medium	46 FPS	324 FPS
high	35 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	272 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 402.5%. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	5,357	26,919+403%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	768	5888+667%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+1497%
Boost Clock	1188 MHz	2475 MHz+108%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	184+283%
L1 Cache	0.28 MB	5.8 MB+1971%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 950 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 375.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	12 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	106 GB/s	504 GB/s+375%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12_1	12.2+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 75.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	90W-55%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-46%	650W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	202mm	304mm
Height	—	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	59.5	134.6+126%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 73.5% less ($440 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 33.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).