
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+207.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+207.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 40HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 58 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 751 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 272 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 4070

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 207.7%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 26,919+208% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5888+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+283% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2475 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 184+28% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5.8 MB+152% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 46+28% |
| Tensor Cores | 288+57% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: No vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | No | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 7.8% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-8% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 134.6+185% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 14.3% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 259.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $599-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 44.9+259% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #302 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













