
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+407.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 534.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌185% higher power demand at 285W vs 100W.
- ❌28400% longer card at 285mm vs 1mm.
Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 285W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 285mm, a 284mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Tesla M6
2015Why buy it
- ✅+407.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 534.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 285W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 285mm, a 284mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌185% higher power demand at 285W vs 100W.
- ❌28400% longer card at 285mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,225 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Tesla M6?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M6 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Tesla M6

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Tesla M6
Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Tesla M6's 6,225 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 407.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+407% | 6,225 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+400% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+1006% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+121% | 1180 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1239% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M6 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M6 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 96.1% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 100W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+78% | 62.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6.2 (Tesla M6) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 537.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+537% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | GM204 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #11 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












