G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+911.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1798.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌19.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 238W.
❌14.9% longer card at 285mm vs 248mm.

Tesla C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 238W instead of 285W, a 47W reduction.
✅Measures 248mm instead of 285mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
87.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Tesla C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅+911.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1798.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 238W instead of 285W, a 47W reduction.
✅Measures 248mm instead of 285mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌19.7% higher power demand at 285W vs 238W.
❌14.9% longer card at 285mm vs 248mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,121 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
87.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Tesla C2070?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 3,121 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Tesla C2070 is a 2011 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2011, 911.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $700 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $1,499 MSRP, and you are getting 911.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1798.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Tesla C2070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Tesla C2070 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Tesla C2070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
1080p
low	188 FPS	83 FPS
medium	171 FPS	72 FPS
high	155 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	68 FPS
medium	125 FPS	59 FPS
high	111 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	24 FPS
medium	79 FPS	23 FPS
high	66 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Tesla C2070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
1080p
low	664 FPS	121 FPS
medium	539 FPS	96 FPS
high	415 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	79 FPS
medium	400 FPS	59 FPS
high	329 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	36 FPS
medium	211 FPS	28 FPS
high	187 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Tesla C2070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
1080p
low	921 FPS	140 FPS
medium	742 FPS	112 FPS
high	652 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	105 FPS
medium	578 FPS	84 FPS
high	497 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	70 FPS
medium	403 FPS	56 FPS
high	352 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Tesla C2070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
1080p
low	879 FPS	140 FPS
medium	731 FPS	112 FPS
high	664 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	105 FPS
medium	585 FPS	84 FPS
high	514 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	70 FPS
medium	408 FPS	56 FPS
high	366 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Tesla C2070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Tesla C2070

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Tesla C2070's 3,121 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 911.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
G3D Mark Score	31,578+912%	3,121
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi
Process Node	4 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	7680+1614%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+3800%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+67%	48
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+752%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+6300%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla C2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+100%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+6300%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	—
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	—
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 18% difference. The Tesla C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Tesla C2070
TDP	285W	238W-16%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	248mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	110.8+746%	13.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 46.7% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1781% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).