
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 234.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌103.6% higher power demand at 285W vs 140W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 285W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 234.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 285W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌103.6% higher power demand at 285W vs 140W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX A4000H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A4000H still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A4000H

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 167.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 240 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+167% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+25% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+109% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+25% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+25% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+25% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+13% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs None. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | None |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 68.2% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 140W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+31% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 234.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+235% | 11.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #11 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












