GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 2025 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 103.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 275% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 64).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 714.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 285W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 103.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 11,162 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 182.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 103.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 182.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Yes. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 285W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 182.9% higher G3D Mark and 103.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low188 FPS135 FPS
medium171 FPS120 FPS
high155 FPS104 FPS
ultra135 FPS87 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS121 FPS
medium125 FPS100 FPS
high111 FPS84 FPS
ultra102 FPS72 FPS
4K
low92 FPS68 FPS
medium79 FPS60 FPS
high66 FPS43 FPS
ultra59 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low664 FPS201 FPS
medium539 FPS171 FPS
high415 FPS134 FPS
ultra366 FPS102 FPS
1440p
low496 FPS140 FPS
medium400 FPS114 FPS
high329 FPS91 FPS
ultra269 FPS72 FPS
4K
low250 FPS81 FPS
medium211 FPS67 FPS
high187 FPS54 FPS
ultra159 FPS41 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low921 FPS502 FPS
medium742 FPS402 FPS
high652 FPS335 FPS
ultra569 FPS251 FPS
1440p
low720 FPS377 FPS
medium578 FPS301 FPS
high497 FPS251 FPS
ultra427 FPS188 FPS
4K
low498 FPS251 FPS
medium403 FPS201 FPS
high352 FPS167 FPS
ultra296 FPS126 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low879 FPS453 FPS
medium731 FPS386 FPS
high664 FPS324 FPS
ultra600 FPS251 FPS
1440p
low706 FPS377 FPS
medium585 FPS301 FPS
high514 FPS251 FPS
ultra460 FPS188 FPS
4K
low477 FPS217 FPS
medium408 FPS170 FPS
high366 FPS153 FPS
ultra324 FPS126 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

NVIDIA

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 182.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 64.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score
31,578+183%
11,162
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
4 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
7680+275%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS+383%
8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2610 MHz+29%
2025 MHz
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
240+275%
64
L1 Cache
7.5 MB+275%
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB+300%
12 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
60+275%
16
Tensor Cores
240+275%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s+294%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
48 MB+300%
12 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder
NVENC (8th Gen)
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (5th Gen)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 156.3% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP
285W
35W-88%
Recommended PSU
700W
500W-29%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
110.8
318.9+188%
💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP
$799
Codename
AD104
AD107
Release
January 3 2023
February 26 2024
Ranking
#11
#254