
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅103.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅275% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 64).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌714.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 285W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅103.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅275% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 64).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 285W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌714.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 126 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 182.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+183% | 11,162 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+383% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+29% | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+275% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+275% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+300% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+275% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+275% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+294% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+300% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 156.3% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 35W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 318.9+188% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | AD107 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | February 26 2024 |
| Ranking | #11 | #254 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












