G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅33.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌147.8% higher power demand at 285W vs 115W.
❌171.4% longer card at 285mm vs 105mm.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 285W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 285mm, a 180mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅33.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 115W instead of 285W, a 170W reduction.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 285mm, a 180mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌147.8% higher power demand at 285W vs 115W.
❌171.4% longer card at 285mm vs 105mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 33.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 25% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and 240 vs 160 Tensor cores.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25.0% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 33.6% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 25.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	188 FPS	141 FPS
medium	171 FPS	122 FPS
high	155 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	113 FPS
medium	125 FPS	94 FPS
high	111 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	50 FPS
medium	79 FPS	44 FPS
high	66 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	664 FPS	370 FPS
medium	539 FPS	316 FPS
high	415 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	213 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	277 FPS
medium	400 FPS	230 FPS
high	329 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	130 FPS
medium	211 FPS	111 FPS
high	187 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	921 FPS	826 FPS
medium	742 FPS	679 FPS
high	652 FPS	612 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	538 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	628 FPS
medium	578 FPS	510 FPS
high	497 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	405 FPS
medium	403 FPS	323 FPS
high	352 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	209 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
1080p
low	879 FPS	287 FPS
medium	731 FPS	248 FPS
high	664 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	228 FPS
medium	585 FPS	200 FPS
high	514 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	140 FPS
medium	408 FPS	118 FPS
high	366 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	78 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 25%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 240 Tensor cores vs 160.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	31,578+25%	25,267
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+50%	5120
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+153%	15.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+74%	1500 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+50%	160
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+50%	5 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB	48 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+50%	40
Tensor Cores	240+50%	160

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+17%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB	48 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 85% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	285W	115W-60%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	105mm
Height	112mm	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	110.8	219.7+98%