G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+479.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅+479.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 285W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌1800% higher power demand at 285W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 31,578).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 479.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 479.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 285W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 285W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti currently gives you 479.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	188 FPS	46 FPS
medium	171 FPS	29 FPS
high	155 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	32 FPS
medium	125 FPS	19 FPS
high	111 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	12 FPS
medium	79 FPS	8 FPS
high	66 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	664 FPS	91 FPS
medium	539 FPS	64 FPS
high	415 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	58 FPS
medium	400 FPS	38 FPS
high	329 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	30 FPS
medium	211 FPS	21 FPS
high	187 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	921 FPS	245 FPS
medium	742 FPS	196 FPS
high	652 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	184 FPS
medium	578 FPS	147 FPS
high	497 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	123 FPS
medium	403 FPS	98 FPS
high	352 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	879 FPS	154 FPS
medium	731 FPS	120 FPS
high	664 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	109 FPS
medium	585 FPS	87 FPS
high	514 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	65 FPS
medium	408 FPS	52 FPS
high	366 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 479.5%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	31,578+480%	5,449
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	7680+1400%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+653%	5.323 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz	2599 MHz
ROPs	80+400%	16
TMUs	240+650%	32
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+5669%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+650%	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	System
Bus Width	192-bit	System
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 180% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon 760M
TDP	285W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	285mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8	363.3+228%