
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅42.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 69.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌67.6% higher power demand at 285W vs 170W.
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 285W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅42.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 285W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌197% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 69.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌67.6% higher power demand at 285W vs 170W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 844 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 317 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 206 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,783 points. Launch price was $309.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB's 18,783 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 68.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+68% | 18,783 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+233% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+255% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+7% | 2450 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+67% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB has 10 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — a 57.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+20% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+57% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB's 170W — a 50.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 170W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 110.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB launched at $269. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB costs 66.3% less ($530 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 69.8 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB offers 76.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $269-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | 69.8+77% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #93 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












