
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅341.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌280% higher power demand at 285W vs 75W.
- ❌65.7% longer card at 285mm vs 172mm.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 285W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 285mm, a 113mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅341.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 285W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 285mm, a 113mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌280% higher power demand at 285W vs 75W.
- ❌65.7% longer card at 285mm vs 172mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 315%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+315% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+250% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 75W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 400W-43% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 172mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+9% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 75.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 3.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+3% | 38.2 |
| Codename | AD104 | — |
| Release | January 3 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #11 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












