
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅36.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 949.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌337.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅36.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 949.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌337.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 13,182 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 139.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+140% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+100% | 3840 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+165% | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+33% | 1967 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96 ×2+20% |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+900% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 60 ×2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 864 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 33.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-29% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 280mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+236% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 77.2% less ($2700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 939.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-77% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+939% | 3.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #11 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












