G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+11.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 460.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅12.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (28,211 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
400.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅+11.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 460.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅12.9% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (28,211 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
400.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 11.9% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 11.9% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $3,200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $3,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 11.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 460.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7900 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $3,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	188 FPS	262 FPS
medium	171 FPS	242 FPS
high	155 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	246 FPS
medium	125 FPS	205 FPS
high	111 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	174 FPS
medium	79 FPS	145 FPS
high	66 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	664 FPS	813 FPS
medium	539 FPS	639 FPS
high	415 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	617 FPS
medium	400 FPS	495 FPS
high	329 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	320 FPS
medium	211 FPS	256 FPS
high	187 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	921 FPS	945 FPS
medium	742 FPS	775 FPS
high	652 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	714 FPS
medium	578 FPS	587 FPS
high	497 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	498 FPS
medium	403 FPS	412 FPS
high	352 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	879 FPS	946 FPS
medium	731 FPS	801 FPS
high	664 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	714 FPS
medium	585 FPS	604 FPS
high	514 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	505 FPS
medium	408 FPS	437 FPS
high	366 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 11.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	31,578+12%	28,211
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+25%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+5%	2495 MHz
ROPs	80	192+140%
TMUs	240	384+60%
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+150%	3 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60	96+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	48 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	864 GB/s+71%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	48 MB+700%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 3.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	285W-3%	295W
Recommended PSU	700W-7%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+16%	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 80% less ($3200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 456.3% better value.