G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅126.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
❌18.8% longer card at 285mm vs 240mm.

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 285mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

✅126.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 285mm, a 45mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.
❌18.8% longer card at 285mm vs 240mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7600?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 126.1% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 16,443 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO W7600 is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 92.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 6nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 33.4% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and you are getting 126.1% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 92.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 44%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7600 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $599 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	188 FPS	129 FPS
medium	171 FPS	112 FPS
high	155 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	106 FPS
medium	125 FPS	87 FPS
high	111 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	49 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	664 FPS	172 FPS
medium	539 FPS	143 FPS
high	415 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	120 FPS
medium	400 FPS	96 FPS
high	329 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	66 FPS
medium	211 FPS	54 FPS
high	187 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	31 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	921 FPS	740 FPS
medium	742 FPS	592 FPS
high	652 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	370 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	555 FPS
medium	578 FPS	444 FPS
high	497 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	277 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	370 FPS
medium	403 FPS	296 FPS
high	352 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	185 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
1080p
low	879 FPS	244 FPS
medium	731 FPS	210 FPS
high	664 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	187 FPS
medium	585 FPS	164 FPS
high	514 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	102 FPS
medium	408 FPS	84 FPS
high	366 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W7600

The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 92%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2440 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
G3D Mark Score	31,578+92%	16,443
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	7680+275%	2048
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+7%	2440 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+88%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+125%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 74.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7600
TDP	285W	130W-54%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	240mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	110.8	126.5+14%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. The Radeon PRO W7600 costs 25% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 43.6% better value.