
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅51.0% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 465.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌137.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅51.0% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 465.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌137.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro VII?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 69 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 149 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro VII

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro VII's 13,264 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 138.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+138% | 13,264 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+100% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+207% | 13.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+54% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+698% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro VII lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro VII's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Radeon Pro VII is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro VII). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 250W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 305mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+109% | 53.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 57.9% less ($1100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 464.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-58% | $1899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+464% | 7.0 |
| Codename | AD104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #11 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












