G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅92.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1578.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
525.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅92.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $4,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1578.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
525.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro M6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 92.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 11,769 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro M6000 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 168.3% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $4,200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 92.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 168.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1578.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M6000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	188 FPS	121 FPS
medium	171 FPS	103 FPS
high	155 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	98 FPS
medium	125 FPS	82 FPS
high	111 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	38 FPS
medium	79 FPS	34 FPS
high	66 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro M6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	664 FPS	187 FPS
medium	539 FPS	166 FPS
high	415 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	128 FPS
medium	400 FPS	104 FPS
high	329 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	60 FPS
medium	211 FPS	50 FPS
high	187 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro M6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	921 FPS	530 FPS
medium	742 FPS	424 FPS
high	652 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	397 FPS
medium	578 FPS	318 FPS
high	497 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	265 FPS
medium	403 FPS	212 FPS
high	352 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	132 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro M6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	879 FPS	233 FPS
medium	731 FPS	200 FPS
high	664 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	137 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	179 FPS
medium	585 FPS	157 FPS
high	514 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	102 FPS
medium	408 FPS	82 FPS
high	366 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro M6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 168.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
G3D Mark Score	31,578+168%	11,769
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	7680+150%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+486%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+134%	1114 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240+25%	192
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+582%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1500%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 59% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+59%	317 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	48 MB+1500%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Quadro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro M6000
TDP	285W	250W-12%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+135%	47.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 84% less ($4200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1545.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).