G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅50.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1917.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌21.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 235W.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 235W instead of 285W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
776.1% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅50.3% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1917.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 235W instead of 285W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌21.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 235W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
776.1% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Quadro GP100?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 50.3% more FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 13,710 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro GP100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016, 130.3% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $6,201 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $7,000 MSRP, and you are getting 50.3% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 130.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1917.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro GP100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro GP100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $7,000 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro GP100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	188 FPS	190 FPS
medium	171 FPS	177 FPS
high	155 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	177 FPS
medium	125 FPS	149 FPS
high	111 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	109 FPS
medium	79 FPS	91 FPS
high	66 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	61 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GP100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	664 FPS	313 FPS
medium	539 FPS	274 FPS
high	415 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	212 FPS
medium	400 FPS	181 FPS
high	329 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	108 FPS
medium	211 FPS	91 FPS
high	187 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GP100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	921 FPS	617 FPS
medium	742 FPS	494 FPS
high	652 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	308 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	463 FPS
medium	578 FPS	370 FPS
high	497 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	308 FPS
medium	403 FPS	247 FPS
high	352 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	154 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GP100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	879 FPS	455 FPS
medium	731 FPS	417 FPS
high	664 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	365 FPS
medium	585 FPS	337 FPS
high	514 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	234 FPS
medium	408 FPS	218 FPS
high	366 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	146 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Quadro GP100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro GP100

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 130.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score	31,578+130%	13,710
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	4 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	7680+114%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+288%	10.34 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+81%	1442 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240+7%	224
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+477%	1.3 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro GP100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 103.2% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	1024 GB/s+103%
Bus Width	192-bit	4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 4th gen
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 19.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Quadro GP100
TDP	285W	235W-18%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+90%	58.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 88.6% less ($6201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1875% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).