
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+477.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1345.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌69.6% longer card at 285mm vs 168mm.
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 285mm, a 117mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅+477.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1345.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 285mm, a 117mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.6% longer card at 285mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and L2

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 477.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 92 (L2) with 240 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+478% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680 | 11776+53% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+4% | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 240 | 368+53% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB | 11.5 MB+53% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 92+53% |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 368+53% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the L2 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the L2's 275W — a 3.6% difference. The L2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 275W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+457% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 60.1% less ($1201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1363% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-60% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+1363% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD104 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












