
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 285W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌90% higher power demand at 285W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2021GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 285W, a 135W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌90% higher power demand at 285W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 801 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,108 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU scores 19,108 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 65.3%. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 10,240 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 34.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,108 | 31,578+65% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 10240+33% | 7680 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 34.1 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2610 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 112+40% | 80 |
| TMUs | 320+33% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 10 MB+33% | 7.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+33% | 60 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 1.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+2% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 48 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 7th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 7th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 62.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-47% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 127.4+15% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #33 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












