
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 285W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌147.8% higher power demand at 285W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 240).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 285W, a 170W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (240 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌147.8% higher power demand at 285W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,157 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile scores 18,157 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 73.9%. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,157 | 31,578+74% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+467% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 2610 MHz+89% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 85% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-60% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 157.9+43% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | TU104B | AD104 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #172 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












