
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌275.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅191.4% more average FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1245.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅191.4% more average FPS across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1245.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 19 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌275.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 258.4%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 31,578+258% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2 | 7680+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 40.09 TFLOPS+694% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 2610 MHz+198% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 7.5 MB+3161% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 567.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2 | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 27.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 285W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 700W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 110.8+371% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 73.4% less ($2200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1262.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $799-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 39.5+1262% |
| Codename | GK110B | AD104 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #300 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













