
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 285W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+260.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 215.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌54.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 185W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 285W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+260.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 215.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 31,578).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌54.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 185W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 40HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 260.9%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) with 288 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 31,578+261% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7680+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+427% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2610 MHz+58% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 7.5 MB+226% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 288+20% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (5th Gen).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 42.6% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-35% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 110.8+134% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The CMP 40HX costs 12.5% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 216% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-13% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 39.5+216% |
| Codename | TU106 | AD104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #302 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













