
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅112.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅112.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 153.3%. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 256 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 19,548+153% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+150% |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 2460 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 3 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+33% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 256+167% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 142.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 272 GB/s+143% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 87.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-61% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5 | 170.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD107 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #349 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












