
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅75.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 611.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅75.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 611.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌234.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Black?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Black still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 113%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177 | 19,548+113% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 3072+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+168% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 2460 MHz+151% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 3 MB+1204% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Black is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 23.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+24% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 115W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 73°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 170.0+363% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 610.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $299-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 65.4+611% |
| Codename | GK110B | AD107 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #288 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













