G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
66.9% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅191.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 481.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅191.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 481.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
66.9% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 680?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 191.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 5,609 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 680 is a 2012 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012, 248.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is about $200 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting 191.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 248.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 481.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 680 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 680 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 680 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	78 FPS	167 FPS
medium	66 FPS	152 FPS
high	53 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	137 FPS
medium	60 FPS	114 FPS
high	42 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	86 FPS
medium	23 FPS	74 FPS
high	15 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	116 FPS	392 FPS
medium	86 FPS	334 FPS
high	66 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	211 FPS
1440p
low	64 FPS	240 FPS
medium	44 FPS	209 FPS
high	32 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	119 FPS
medium	17 FPS	98 FPS
high	13 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	252 FPS	812 FPS
medium	202 FPS	642 FPS
high	168 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	535 FPS
medium	151 FPS	443 FPS
high	126 FPS	379 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	126 FPS	365 FPS
medium	101 FPS	297 FPS
high	84 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	186 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680 Open GeForce RTX 4060

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
1080p
low	126 FPS	746 FPS
medium	101 FPS	613 FPS
high	86 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	97 FPS	594 FPS
medium	78 FPS	486 FPS
high	67 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	330 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	358 FPS
medium	44 FPS	308 FPS
high	35 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	220 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680 Open GeForce RTX 4060

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 248.5%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 2460 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	5,609	19,548+249%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1536	3072+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+365%
Boost Clock	1058 MHz	2460 MHz+133%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	128+33%	96
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	3 MB+2208%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 680 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 680 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 41.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	272 GB/s+42%
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 51.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 256mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	195W	115W-41%
Recommended PSU	550W	550W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	256mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	98°C	73°C-26%
Perf/Watt	28.8	170.0+490%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 40.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 483.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).