
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅119.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌136.1% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅119.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌136.1% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 110.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 72 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,651+111% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+226% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2535 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 136+89% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.3 MB+87% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 136+89% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 288 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 78.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-56% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+8% | 141.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 57.6% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 12% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-58% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+12% | 56.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












