
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅88.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅164.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅88.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 136).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅164.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 193.5%. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 256 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 22,651+194% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4352+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+265% |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 2535 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 136+113% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.3 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 34+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 256+88% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 157.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288 GB/s+157% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 112.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-72% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+21% | 141.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD106 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #349 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












