G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅207.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 48.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570

2022

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.

Why buy it

✅207.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 48.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce MX570?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 207.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 5,738 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce MX570 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 294.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 166.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 207.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 294.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 48.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce MX570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce MX570 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $150 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	81 FPS	177 FPS
medium	69 FPS	162 FPS
high	56 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	71 FPS	143 FPS
medium	62 FPS	118 FPS
high	44 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	93 FPS
medium	24 FPS	79 FPS
high	16 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	160 FPS	433 FPS
medium	129 FPS	363 FPS
high	99 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	278 FPS
medium	91 FPS	238 FPS
high	71 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	123 FPS
medium	54 FPS	102 FPS
high	42 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	65 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	258 FPS	855 FPS
medium	207 FPS	693 FPS
high	172 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	660 FPS
medium	155 FPS	527 FPS
high	129 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	447 FPS
medium	103 FPS	355 FPS
high	86 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	137 FPS	775 FPS
medium	113 FPS	639 FPS
high	95 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	492 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	613 FPS
medium	86 FPS	503 FPS
high	73 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	375 FPS
medium	49 FPS	322 FPS
high	39 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	255 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 294.8%. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 64 Tensor cores vs 136.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	5,738	22,651+295%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2048	4352+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+366%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2535 MHz+119%
ROPs	40	48+20%
TMUs	64	136+113%
L1 Cache	2 MB	4.3 MB+115%
L2 Cache	2 MB	32 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores	16	34+113%
Tensor Cores	64	136+113%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX570 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	288 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	32 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX570	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	25W-84%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	229.5+62%	141.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce MX570 costs 62.4% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 48.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).