
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅158.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 319.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅158.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 319.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 780 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 139.2%. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469 | 22,651+139% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 4352+51% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+313% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 2535 MHz+173% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+76% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 4.3 MB+1770% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 70°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9 | 141.6+274% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 42.9% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 320.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $399-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 56.8+321% |
| Codename | GK110B | AD106 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #278 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













